Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liaison Committee for the Reconstruction of the Fourth International

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 08:24, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Liaison Committee for the Reconstruction of the Fourth International

Delete Permanent stub about a minor group that lasted for less than ten years. Violates WP:V. Article not updated since May 2005. --metzerly 08:46, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, nn and unsourced/unverifiable.--Jersey Devil 08:50, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn and unverifiable. --Terence Ong 12:21, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• delete per above. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:22, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above --Khoikhoi 06:51, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, verifiable (ever tried google?). [1] [2] Secondly, POR(Masas) is by itself not a very large group, but it is a historical inheritor of the original POR, which was one of the largest political parties in Bolivia in its haydays. --Soman 13:12, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment, the article has now been expanded somewhat and references. Also, it appears POR(Masas) is identical to the original POR. --Soman 13:28, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment, the article still fails notability. It was an international group that existed for less than ten years--when the POR was a shell of its former self. Except for POR, none of the groups in this international are notworthy. --metzerly 15:35, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment. notability is something relative. For someone doing research on developments of trotskyist movements in Latin America, its highly relevant to know what happened to POR's international relations. Deleting the article would leave a possible in other articles. Also, ten years is hardly a shorty period in politics. --Soman 18:36, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. CERCI was an important international in Latin America. —Sesel 01:12, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Article has been rewritten, in the interest of making the right decision I think this needs further consideration.W.marsh 04:48, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, article has been rewritten; seems to be an important group in Latin America --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 04:53, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per TBC. Royboycrashfan 04:58, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Newyorktimescrossword 20:26, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• keep per all above Jcuk 22:37, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep More dull Trots, but certainly at least as notable as the other internationals listed on Wikipedia. ProhibitOnions 23:04, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --Jay(Reply) 23:19, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep: Wikipedia is not paper. Peter Grey 06:38, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.