Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Požarevačka gimnazija
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Merging may be discussed on the article's talk page, if desired. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:06, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Požarevačka gimnazija (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article doesn't seem notable. Would suggest a merge. LouriePieterse 16:14, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Secondary schools in the US are apparently automatically notable, but I don't think the principle applies to overseas.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 19:24, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. For most people the US is "overseas". Phil Bridger (talk) 16:19, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions.
- Keep. All secondary schools everywhere are notable. I added an infobox and a newspaper article about a careers event there. -- Eastmain (talk) 22:50, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep We should use the same rationale to keep this high school just like we do with the Americans, if not this is a case of WP:BIAS. It should be noted that the article has a reference confirming the existence of this school. --Jmundo (talk) 22:58, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - secondary schools are notable. TerriersFan (talk) 23:25, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep if secondary schools in the US are automatically notable, secondary schools everywhere are. ~~ GB fan ~~ talk 00:00, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep All secondary schools are notable. Cunard (talk) 00:29, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Just had to post here that I strongly object that all X is notable is a valid argument for any X, as per WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. And yes, this includes schools. No opinion as to the individual article at hand, but just had to get that out there. ThemFromSpace 03:04, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or Merge to Požarevac - This article seems to represent the problem of systematic bias on Wikipedia. I have not found many sources through Google in English, though given that this school is in Serbia I am not surprised. I suspect there may be coverage in Serbian and some help from those that speak Serbian would be good (yes sources do not have to be in English per WP:V). While I am not a fan of mergers of probable notable articles, a merge into Požarevac may be a good compromise. That locality article currently does not even mention the school, and if the article is kept a summary and link should still be provided there anyway. Don't get how WP:INDISCRIMINATE applies, as nothing listed there seems to apply here. As for inherited notability, well for schools that is a wider Wikipedia dispute on which there is not a clear consensus on, I would prefer to focus on the article at hand for AfDs. Camaron · Christopher · talk 12:24, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Inherited notability is not what I would call it --this is a practical working standard, very well accepted for a few years now, that essentially all secondary schools have enough sources if they are searched for carefully enough, and therefore we should not waste time debating them to catch a few percent that might not. Middle and elementary schools-- they get merged, for the complementary reason--almost none of them can be shown to be notable. DGG ( talk ) 05:06, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: DGG I am becoming one of your many fans! - Ret.Prof (talk) 01:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.